Archive

Author Archive

Top 10 Product Categories for Teens

July 15, 2009 Leave a comment

Brandweek recently published the Top 10 Product Categories for Teens based on 2008 ad spend with teen publications.

1. Apparel: $40.1M

2. Fragrances (female): $14.6M

3. Entertainment Software: $14M

4. Sporting Footwear: $10M

5. Department Store: $8.6M

6. Apparel Store: $8.6M

7. Shoes: $8.2M

8. Lipstick: $6.4M

9. Antiperspirant/Deodorant: $5M

10. Mascara $5M

Breaking through to reach teens with your apparel brand takes intelligence, direction, opinion, and a plan. Amazing that the second largest ad spend category in 2008 is almost three times lower than apparel.  With teens wearing a multitude of brands – companies need to look well beyond their competitive set to ride above the noise and be heard.  As action sports apparel companies continue to reach beyond beach wear, the ad spends from competitors get heavier, the research deeper, and the experience…well….more.

It’s time to place every brand that a teen wears and review their media consumption and the ads they view on the table – not just what they see in your industry.

0623_teenmags

Categories: Uncategorized

Would you invite your brand to your party?

Your brand?Brands are/have personalities.  You know this, but maybe it’s time to rethink. What’s your brands personality?  Would you invite your brand to your party?  Would you invite your brand to work in your department at work?  Depending on the objective of your brand, it must serve at least one of these two scenarios.

For example, you may not invite the dorky guy with the pocket protector to your party, but you definitely want him on your patent team.  Your brands image and voice needs to reflect your strengths and ultimate brand direction.  That’s the business example. Now let’s look at the “teen brand” example.

Here is an exercise…imagine all of the brands in your competitive set as stereotypes from high school.  Which personality is your brand?  Are you the jock, the cheerleader, the nerd, the dork, the stoner, the quiet one, the rocker, the drunk, the showman, the stud, the slut…you get the idea.  Does your brand show up at the party first and leave early? Does your brand hang by the keg and get loaded? Does your brand get the hottest chick at the party? Does your brand even show up or care about the party? Is your brand desperately trying to get invited to the party? Are others at the party glad your brand showed up? Does your brand arrive and leave without anyone noticing?

Think about where your brand personality is today and where you want it to be.  Does your brands personality meet with your business objective. If our goal is to take over the industry, but your personality is the stoner, you may only appeal to so many consumers.  If your brand is so vanilla that no one responds either way to it, then you may be stuck in the middle.  Would you want to be stuck in the corner talking to your brand?  Is your brand too old to be at the party but is just there to relive its old high-school days?  Is your brand passed out on the corner…playing good music…laughing…fighting…?

Now place these brands at the party and describe them as the interact at the actual event:

Nike – Ford – Budweiser – Apple – Affliction – Microsoft – Burton – Quiksilver – O’Neill – Nokia – Hollister – Grenade – Pac Sun – Volcom.

If you ran a focus group of teens and asked them…just based on brand personalities..who they would invite to their party…would your brand get invited?

Categories: WTF

Socratic method?

The sound and the fury

The sound and the fury

Ever heard of the socratic method?  How about using it as a management style?

Discuss?

Categories: Uncategorized
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.